Accelerated shelf-life testing (ASLT): what it is, and what it is not


How to shrink a one-year shelf-life study into weeks, when it works, and when excess stress creates a failure that never happens on the shelf.

Laboratory glassware

Nobody wants to wait a year to find out whether a product keeps for a year. Accelerated shelf-life testing (ASLT) is the industry’s way of getting an early read. It is a good tool, provided you understand what it measures and what it does not.

The idea

Expose the product to stress conditions that accelerate a defined deterioration mechanism: higher temperature, controlled relative humidity, more oxygen, light, or temperature cycling. Measure the relevant marker (water activity, peroxide value, texture, colour, taste) at fixed time points, and use a kinetic model to translate the rate under stress into the rate under normal storage.

The most common rule is Q10: by how much the reaction rate multiplies for a 10 °C rise. For lipid oxidation and many chemical reactions Q10 is between 2 and 4. In other words, storing at 40 °C instead of 20 °C can accelerate things 4 to 16 times. Behind it stands the Arrhenius equation, which links reaction rate to temperature.

When it works

  • When the failure mechanism is known and mainly chemical: oxidation, colour change, vitamin loss, Maillard browning.
  • When the product does not change phase at the stress temperature (a fat that melts at 40 °C is a different product).
  • When there is a marker you can measure objectively, with a defined failure limit.
  • When you have data from at least two or three temperatures, to calibrate the model rather than guess a Q10.

When it misleads

  • The mechanism switches. At high temperature a product can fail from something that never happens under refrigeration: starch crystallizing differently, a protein breaking down. The result is a “failed” test on a mechanism irrelevant to the shelf.
  • Moisture. Temperature acceleration does not simulate moisture uptake. For crisp products you need to control relative humidity, not only temperature.
  • Microbiology. Microbial growth cannot be “accelerated” in a way that translates to shelf conditions. Here you are left with challenge tests and real-time testing.
  • Packaging. Film barrier changes with temperature and humidity. What is measured at 40 °C does not always represent the barrier at 20 °C.

What you need before you start

  1. A clear definition of the failure: the marker, and the value at which the product is unacceptable (fracture force below X newtons, or a taste score below Y).
  2. A precise day-zero measurement, including aw, pH, moisture and texture.
  3. Two or three temperatures (or humidities) and sampling intervals chosen in advance.
  4. A real-time validation plan running in parallel, even if it takes longer.

How we do it

At Foodlab we start from a shelf-life simulation that shows which mechanisms are likely to dominate, and then choose the acceleration conditions for that mechanism rather than “40 °C because that is what people do”. Where the mechanism and the data allow, an Arrhenius model is translated into an estimate for normal storage. And always: accelerated testing complements real-time testing, it does not replace it.

More on the service at The Whole Package, and on the mechanisms themselves in Why does my snack go soft.

Related articles


Let's put your idea on the bench

A short first conversation: the product or challenge, the market, where you are, and what's already known. Then we ask for a short brief and come back with a proposal.

Talk to us

Questions about cost, timelines or who owns the formula? Read the FAQ